Skip to main content

It was a dark and stormy night...

I'm a sucker for a trashy romance novel. It can be romantic suspense, historical gush, paranormal erotica, or the basis for the next Lifetime movie of the week. I'm not picky.

That said, I do have a few minor complaints about overused phrases, corny setups, and euphemisms for humans' nether regions. Not that I have room to criticize, when I've only written nine chapters of my supposed "Great American Novel" and the first chapter includes a wacky combination of protagonist, battery-powered romance aid, and a boatload of guilt over what's being done beneath Granny's hand-pieced quilt.

I happened across a readers' forum on Amazon.com, titled "Author Quirks We Notice & Love (Or Hate)." Can we say, "Critical, much?" Nothing gets past these militant romance readers. Still, I found myself laughing out loud and completely relating to many of their observations. We continue to read these authors despite the flaws, putting even more money in their stuffed pockets and rocketing them, once again, to the top of the NYT Bestseller list.

I'll share a few of the more common irritations. Even if you never read romances, you're allowed to guffaw. These are fairly heinous.

-- Laurell K. Hamilton's Anita Blake Vampire Hunter series is a guilty pleasure of mine. However, I'm glad to know I'm not the only person rolling her eyes at the oft-used description of yet another group of people sleeping in "warm puppy piles." As if she's trying to soften the fact that the main character is frequently at the center of an orgy that involves vampires and an assortment of wereanimals. Nothing screams romantic moment like puppies? Try again.

-- I agree with "Kyra," who made an observation about detesting when an author "constantly uses the same words and phrases. She gave one example from an unidentified book: undulate. "The heroine undulated. The hero undulated. The horizon undulated. The clouds in the sky undulated. And because it was a paranormal, at one point the HOUSE undulated. Good grief!"

-- "Bared her teeth"...can someone do this without looking like a) a chimpanzee or b) a horse?

-- She must live in the land of the Olympic-sized pool, because MaryJanice Davidson describes nearly every male character (main hero and minor player alike) as having "a swimmer's build." And Laurell K. Hamilton's Anita would be OK with that because, at least 10 times in every book, describes some sort of sexual position or situation or body type as being something "that just flat out does it for me." Who needs creativity when imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, especially when you imitate yourself!

-- Why are women always "mewling"? What IS that anyway?! I am pretty damn sure I've never mewled. At least I hope not.

-- Tender folds and throbbing manhood. 'Nuff said.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is it OK to own a Canadian?

In her radio show, Dr Laura Schlesinger said that, as an observant Orthodox Jew, homosexuality is an abomination according to Leviticus 18:22, and cannot be condoned under any circumstance. The following response is an open letter to Dr. Laura, written by a U.S. resident, and posted on the Internet. It's funny, as well as informative: Dear Dr. Laura: Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law. I have learned a great deal from your show, and try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination ... End of debate. I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some other elements of God's Laws and how to follow them. 1. Leviticus 25:44 states that I may possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexic...

In memoriam...

I remember the first time I heard the name "Les Anderson." A bunch of Wichita State University communication majors were sitting around on campus, talking about classes they planned to take. Several people warned me: watch out for Les Anderson. He was tough. He had a murderous grading scale. It was nearly impossible to get an A. They weren't kidding. But he wasn't tough just to be a tyrant. From his teaching sprang a fleet of incredible, successful journalists, writers, editors, broadcasters, public relations experts, advertisers, non-profit professionals...I could go on and on. Most importantly, he created a legion of people who wanted to make a difference in the world. The greatest gift Les gave to them all? He believed in them, cared about them for their own personal stories as well as the stories they told for class assignments or in the pages of his hometown newspaper. Les was my teacher. My boss. My mentor. My conscience. My champion. My friend. When I started c...

Holy Separated-At-Birth, Batman!

Gary Oldman...meet Uncle Knit-Knots from Imagination Movers.